Which of the following is a possible consequence of insufficient staffing based on individual abilities?

Insufficient staffing based on individual abilities can lead to a decrease in efficiency and morale for several reasons. When employees do not possess the necessary skills or experience required for their roles, their ability to perform tasks effectively diminishes. This can result in increased errors, longer completion times for tasks, and a reduced overall quality of work.

Additionally, when individuals are placed in positions that do not match their abilities, they may feel overwhelmed or frustrated. This mismatch can lead to low morale, as employees may perceive that they are not set up for success or adequately supported in their roles. Over time, if employees feel unsupported and ineffective, their motivation and engagement can decline significantly.

While the other choices suggest positive outcomes, such as increased job satisfaction, higher retention rates, or lower operational costs, these do not align with the scenario presented. Instead, the correct outcome highlights the detrimental effects that can arise from inadequate staffing choices, emphasizing the importance of matching individual abilities to job requirements to maintain efficiency and morale within the workforce.