What analysis determines if the results justify the costs of control measures?

The concept of a Cost-Benefit Analysis is centered around evaluating the financial implications of implementing control measures, comparing the anticipated benefits against the associated costs. This form of analysis is crucial in decision-making processes, especially when resources are limited or when evaluating the effectiveness of various interventions. By examining both the economic benefits and the costs incurred, a Cost-Benefit Analysis provides a clear framework for assessing whether specific control measures are justifiable and worthwhile in terms of their outcomes.

The other options, while relevant in their respective contexts, do not specifically address the evaluation of costs versus benefits. An Impact Assessment focuses on understanding the potential consequences of a project or action on the environment, society, or economy but does not inherently evaluate the cost implications of control measures. A Performance Review generally assesses the operational efficiency and effectiveness of programs or personnel but is not specifically tied to the financial justification of control measures. An Environmental Study examines the interactions between human activity and the environment, providing data that may inform decisions but not specifically comparing costs and benefits directly related to control measures. Therefore, the focus on economic justification makes Cost-Benefit Analysis the correct choice in this context.